<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia: subject to the laws of the United States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/</link>
	<description>a blog about things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 06:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-16415</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/#comment-16415</guid>
		<description>Hew Griffiths could have and should have been tried in Australia. Australia and the US are both signatories of the WTO  TRIPs Agreement. This agreement states that countries must have laws to protect foreign copyrights. Australia has these laws.

Both the US and Australian Governments ignored this agreement in this case. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hew Griffiths could have and should have been tried in Australia. Australia and the US are both signatories of the WTO  TRIPs Agreement. This agreement states that countries must have laws to protect foreign copyrights. Australia has these laws.</p>
<p>Both the US and Australian Governments ignored this agreement in this case. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-16049</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/#comment-16049</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article alia: subject to the laws of the United States at  a roll of the dice, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article alia: subject to the laws of the United States at  a roll of the dice, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-13934</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/#comment-13934</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t doubt that there was some connection in this instance.  But there are other aspects to extradition - we do not simply extradite anyone who is demanded by another country, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that there was some connection in this instance.  But there are other aspects to extradition &#8211; we do not simply extradite anyone who is demanded by another country, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDU</title>
		<link>http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-13565</link>
		<dc:creator>LDU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelligentdesign.com.au/blog/2007/07/17/australia-subject-to-the-laws-of-the-united-states/#comment-13565</guid>
		<description>Well...I&#039;m not familiar with US laws but the current australian test regarding extraterritorial operation of legislation is that there must be sufficient connection between the subject matter of the legislation and the state concerned. Perhaps the US has something similar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;I&#8217;m not familiar with US laws but the current australian test regarding extraterritorial operation of legislation is that there must be sufficient connection between the subject matter of the legislation and the state concerned. Perhaps the US has something similar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

